[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 9, Issue 18 (10-2021) ::
PEC 2021, 9(18): 303-323 Back to browse issues page
Morphology of Acer monspessulanum L. in some Iranian forest habitats
Vahideh Payame nor * , Ali Sattarian , Farzaneh Moghbel Esfahani , Akram Ahmadi
, mnoori56@gmail.com
Abstract:   (2249 Views)


In order to investigate the morphological variation of maple (Acer monspessulanum L.) in Iran, five populations from different habitats were studied including Mazandaran, Isfahan, Lorestan, Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad and Golestan. The evaluated characteristic were  including: leaf morphological traits (leaf length, width at 1/2 leaf length, leaf thickness, width at 1/4 leaf length, width at 3/4 leaf length, right vein length, middle vein length, left vein length, right lobe length , Middle lobe length, left lobe length, petiole length, sinus, leaf base shape, leaf tip shape, broad shape, relative petiole length), stoma (length, width, area, length to width ratio, circumference, density) and trichome. The results showed that the type of trichome was not different in different habitats and all were multi simple cell types. In spite of a few differences between populations, all populations had parasitic trichome. It sounds that trichome and stomata not to be suitable for Acer monspessulanum recognition. In the study of leaf traits, sampled individuals were separated from 5 populations in 4 clusters. The Yasuj and Mazandaran populations had the closest kinship to each other than the other populations and the Gorgan population had the most distribution. In general, considering the studied traits, it can be concluded that leaf traits including leaf sinus traits, leaf thickness, width at 3/4 leaf length, leaf shape, petiole length and leaf base shape were less affected by the environments that can be used as distinctive traits in the Acer monspessulanum species

Keywords: Acer monspessulanum, Morphological Variation, Trichome, Leaf
Full-Text [PDF 1017 kb]   (469 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2020/02/12 | Accepted: 2021/01/19 | Published: 2021/09/28
References
1. Agrawal, A.A., Fishbein, M.2006. Plant defense syndromes. Ecology 87: 132–149.
2. Akbarian, M.R., Tabari, M.,Akbarinia, M., Zarafshar, M., Meave, J.A., Yosefzadeh, H.,Satarian, A. 2011. Effected of elevation gradiant on leaf and stomata morphology of Caucasian alder( Alnussubcordata) in Hyrcanian forests (Iran). Journal of Folia oecologica, 38(1):1-7.
3. Amini, T., Zare, H., Alizadeh, B. 2016. A revision of acer monspessulanum l. in iran; a new subspecies report. IRAN. J. BOT., 22 (2): 121-124.
4. Aas, G., Aier, J., Baltisberger, M. and Matzger, S., 1994. Morphology, isozyme variation, cytology, and reproduction of hybrids between Sorbus aria (L) Crantz and S. torminalis(L). Crantz. Helv, 104: 195-214.
5. Baranova, M.1992. Principles of comparative stomatographic studies of flowering plants. Botanical Review, 58(1): 49-99.
6. Dilcher, D.L. 1974. Approaches to the identification of angiosperm leaf remains. Botanical Review, 40: 1-157.
7. Hovenden, M.J., Vander Schoor, J.K. 2004. Nature versus nurture in the leaf morphology of southern beech, Nothofaguscunninghamii (Nothofagaceae). New Phytologist. 161: 585–594.
8. Jones, D., Wilkins, D. 1971. Variation and adaptation in plant species, London, Heinemenn, 184p.
9. Johnson, R.A. and Wichern, D.W. 2002 Applied multivariate sta- tistical analysis, 5th ed. Prentice Hall Inc., New Jersey.
10. Kovacic, S., Nikolic T. 2005. relations between betula pendula roth. (betulaceae) leaf morphology and environmental factors in five regions of Croatia. Acta BiologicaCracoviensia Series Botanica, 47/2: 7–13.
11. Linhart, Y.B., Grant, M.C. 1996. Evolutionary significance of local genetic differentiation in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematic, 27: 237-277.
12. Luo, Y., Zhou, Z.K. 2001. Cuticle of Quercus sugen. Cyclobalanopsis (Oerst.) chneid. (Fagaceae). Acta PhytotaxSinica, 39: 489-501.
13. Mayer, E., Eshlok, P. 1991. Principles of Systematic Zoology. 511p
14. Miles, L.M., Jeanne, A.M., Robert, D.W.1995. Provenance and progeny variation in growth and frost tolerance of Casuarina Cunninghmianain California, USA. Forest Ecology and Management79:161-171.
15. Obiremi, E.O., Oladele, F.A. 2001. Water-conserving stomatal systems in selected Citrus species. South African Journal of Botany, 67: 258-260.
16. Oyeleke, M.O., AbdulRahaman, A.A., Oladele, F.A. 2004. Stomatal anatomy and transpiration rate in some afforestation tree species. Nigerian Society for Experimental Biology Journal (NISEB), 4: 83-90.
17. Parveen, N.S., Murthy, K.S.R., Pullaiah, T. 2000. Leaf epidermal characters in Crotalaria species (Papilionoidea) from Eastern Ghats. Phytomorphology 50: 205–212.
18. Rechinger, K.H. 1982. Editor, Flora Iranica vol. AkademischeDruck- undVerlagsanstalt, Graz, 150: 354-396.
19. Sattarian, A. 2006. Contribution to the Biosystematics of Celtis L. (Celtidaceae) with special emphasis on the African species.Ph.D. Thesis Wageningen University, Wageningen, 142p.
20. Schmidt, K.P., Levin, D.A. 1985. The comparative of reciprocally sown populations of Phlox drummondii Hook. I. Survivorships, fecundities and finite rates of increase. Journal of Plant Evolution, 39: 396-404.
21. Schoettle, A.W., Rochelle, S.G. 2000. Morphological variation of Pinus flexilis(Pinaceae), a bird-dispersed pine, across a range of elevations. American Journal of Botany. 87: 1797-806. Society. 63: 235-246.
22. Valkama, E., Salminen, J., Koricheva, J., Pihlaja. K. 2003. Comparative Analysis of Leaf Trichome Structure and Composition of Epicuticular Flavonoids in Finnish Birch Species. Annals of Botany, 91(6): 643-55
23. Van Cotthem, W.R.J. 1970. A classification of stomata1 types. Botanical Journal of the Linnean.
24. Van gelderen, D.M., De jong, P.C., Oterdoom. H.J. 1994. Maples of the World. Timber Press, Portlan.
25. Vesque, I. 1889. Dc I’emploi des caractkresanatomiques dans la classification des vigktaux. Bulletin de la Société Botanique, 36: 41-77.
26. Yoo, K. O., Wen, J. 2002. Phylogeny and biogeography of carpinus and subfamily Coryloideae (Betulaceae). International Journal of Plant sciences. 163: 641-650.
27. Yuan-Yuan Chuang, Y.Y., Liu, H.H. 2003. Leaf Epidermal Morphology and Its Systematic Implications in Taiwan Pteridaceae. Taiwania, 48(1): 60-71.
28. Zhang, J.W., Marshall, J.D. 1995. Variation in carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthetic gas exchange among populations of Pseudotsugamenziesii and Pinus ponderosa in different environments. Functional Ecology, 9: 402-412.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Payame nor V, Sattarian A, Moghbel Esfahani F, Ahmadi A. Morphology of Acer monspessulanum L. in some Iranian forest habitats. PEC 2021; 9 (18) :303-323
URL: http://pec.gonbad.ac.ir/article-1-666-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 9, Issue 18 (10-2021) Back to browse issues page
مجله حفاظت زیست بوم گیاهان Journal of Plant Ecosystem Conservation
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645