[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
:: Volume 8, Issue 17 (2-2021) ::
PEC 2021, 8(17): 71-88 Back to browse issues page
Investigating the Effect of Topographic factors on the distribution of oriental beech in Hyrcanian forest, Iran
Ali Jafari *, Fatemeh Aliary Mrs2, Koroush Ahmadi Dr.3
Shahrekord University, faculty of natural resources , jafari.ali@sku.ac.ir
2- faculty of natural resources
3- Tarbiat Modarres
Abstract:   (218 Views)
Present and future distribution status of important forest species needs to be studied as a prerequisite for the need of conservation programs. This thus can play an undeniable role in tackling global climate change, land use change and air pollution. The main purpose of this study was to determine the distribution of oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) under the influence of topographic factors in forests of northern Iran. In so doing, the present distribution status of this species in the 51 watershed of Mazandaran province was determined. Also, the relationship between the main topographic factors (slope, direction, elevation) and sub-components factors (topographic moisture, surface curvature and cross-section curvature) was analyzed and modeled using boosted regression tree (BRT) model and R software package. Under the curve area statistics (AUC) and actual threshold-related skill statistics (TSS) were used to evaluate the model. Findings showed that the AUC and TSS were 0.82 and 0.63, respectively. This indicates that the model was able to predict the distribution of this species. The results also showed that altitude and slope percentages had the most influence on the distribution of this species and the distribution was less affected by secondary topographic variables such as topographic moisture, cross-section curvature and surface curvature. This species is more likely to occur in slopes of 20 to 60 percent, in the northern and eastern directions, and at altitudes of 500 to 1500 meters above sea level. The habitats located at this topographic location are more likely to be affected by future climate change scenarios. Therefore planning and implementing conservation plans for this species in northern forests of Iran seems necessary.
Keywords: Oriental beech, Suitable habitat, Boosted regression tree, Height above sea level, geographic aspect, Slope
Full-Text [PDF 538 kb]   (56 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2019/11/12 | Accepted: 2020/07/19 | Published: 2021/03/12
1. Adel, M.N., Pourbabaei, H., Dey, D.C., 2014. Ecologicalspeciesgroup—Environmentalfactors RelationshipsinunharvestedbeechforestsinthenorthofIran.EcologicalEngineering, 69:1-7.
2. Ahmadi, K., JalilAlavi, S., Kouchaksaraei, M. T., &Aertsen, W., 2013. Non-linear height-diameter models for oriental beech (FagusorientalisLipsky) in the Hyrcanian forests, Iran. Biotechnology, Agronomy, Society and Environment, 17(3), 431-440.
3. Ahmadi, K., &Alavi, S. J., 2016.Generalized height-diameter models for FagusorientalisLipsky in Hyrcanian forest, Iran. Journal of forest science, 62(9), 413-421.
4. - Ahmadi, K., Alavi, S. J., &Kouchaksaraei, M. T., 2017.Constructing site quality curves and productivity assessment for uneven-aged and mixed stands of oriental beech (Fagus oriental Lipsky) in Hyrcanian forest, Iran. Forest science and technology, 13(1), 41-46.
5. Alavi, S. J., Ahmadi, K., Hosseini, S. M., Tabari, M., &Nouri, Z. (2019). The response of English yew (Taxusbaccata L.) to climate change in the Caspian Hyrcanian Mixed Forest ecoregion. Regional Environmental Change, 19(5): 1495-1506.
6. Alaska Satelatite Facility. 2010. Available online: https://vertex.daac.asf.alaska.edu.
7. Allouche, O., Tsoar, A. and Kadmon, R., 2006. Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). Journal of Applied Ecology, 43, 1223–1232.
8. Aragon, C.F., Albert, M.J., Nez-Benavides, L.G., Luzuriaga, A.L., and Escudero, A.N. 2007. Environmental scales on the reproduction of a Gypsophyte: A hierarchical approach. J. Bot. 99: 519-527.
9. - Austin, M.P. 2002. Spatial prediction of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling. Ecological Modeling, 157: 101–118.
10. Carmel, Y., and Kadmon, R. 1999. Effects of grazing and topography on long-term vegetation changes in a Mediterranean ecosystem in Israel. Plant Ecology, 145: 243-254.
11. Dobrowski, S.Z., 2011. A Climatic Basis for Microrefugia: The Influence of Terrain on Climate. Global Change Biology, 17, 1022-1035.
12. Downing, A. J. and Selkirk, P. M., 1993. "Bryophytes on the calcareous soils of Mungo National Park, an arid area of southern central Australia," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 53: No. 1, Article 3.
13. - Duan, R-Y, Kong, X-Q, Huang, M-Y, Fan, W-Y. and Wang, Z-G. 2014. The Predictive Performance and Stability of Six Species Distribution Models. PLoS ONE 9(11): e112764.
14. Elith, J., Graham, C.H., Anderson, R.P. 2006. Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Echography, 29: 129-151.
15. - Elith, J., Leathwick, J.R. and Hastie, T., 2008. A working guide to boosted regression trees. Journal of Animal Ecology, 77 (4): 802–813.
16. -Enright, N.J., Miller, B.P., and Akhter, R. 2005. Desert vegetation andvegetation-environment relationships in Kirthar national park, Sindh, Pakistan. J. Arid Environ. 61: 397-418.
17. - Fielding, A.H. and Bell, J.F. 1997. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models.Environmental Conservation, 24(1): 38-49.
18. Fourcade, Y., Engler, J.O., RodderD., and Secondi,J. 2014. Mapping Species Distributions with MAXENT Using a Geographically Biased Sample of Presence Data: A Performance Assessment of Methods for Correcting Sampling Bias.PLoS ONE 9(5): e97122.
19. Giovanell, J.F. and Alexandrino, J. 2010. Modeling a spatially restricted distribution in the Neotropics: how the size of calibration area affects the performance of five presence-only methods.Ecological Modeling, 221: 215-224.
20. Goldi, A. 2001. Relationships between aspect and plant distribution on calcareous soils near Missoula, Montana. J. Northwest Sci. 75: 3. 197-203.
21. Grabs, T., Seibert, J., Bishop, K., and Laudon, H. 2009. Modeling spatial patterns of saturated areas: A comparison of the topographic wetness index and a dynamic distributed model. J. Hydrol. 373: 15-23.
22. Gungoroglu C., 2015. Spatial distribution analysis of Beech (FagusorientalisLipsky) stands in Buyukduz research forest. 10th International Beech Symposium, Kastamonu, Turkey, September,1-6, 2015.
23. Moeslund J. E., Arge, L., Bøcher, P. K., Dalgaard, T., Ejrnæs, R., Odgaard, M. V., Svenning, J. C., 2013. Topographically controlled soil moisture drives plant diversity patterns within grasslands. Biodiversity Conservation, doi:10.1007/s10531-013-0442-3.
24. -Remya, K., Ramachandran, A., Jayakumar, S., 2015. Predicting the current and future suitable habitat distribution of MyristicadactyloidesGaertn.usingMaxEnt model in the Eastern Ghats, India. Ecological Engineering, 82, 184-188.
25. Shabani, F., Kumar, L., Ahmadi, M., 2018. Assessing Accuracy Methods of Species Distribution Models: AUC, Specificity, Sensitivity and the True Skill Statistic.ActaScientiarum Human and Social Sciences, 18(1): 7-17.
26. Sagheb-Talebi, K., Sajedi, T., &Pourhashemi, M., 2014. Forests of Iran: A Treasure from the Past, a Hope for the Future. Netherlands: Springer Publishing.
27. Solon, J., Degorski, M., and Roo-Zielinska, E. 2007. Vegetation response to a topographical-soil gradient. J. Catena, 71: 309-320.
28. Schoenholtz, S.H., Van Miegroet, H., and Burger, J.A. 2000. A review of chemical and physical properties as indicators of forest soil quality: challenges and opportunities. Forest Ecology and Management, 138: 335-356.
29. Sorensen, R., Zinko, U., and Seibert, J. 2005. On the calculation of the topographic wetness index: evaluation of different methods based on field observation. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. 10: 101-112.
30. Steege, H &Zagt, R. 2002. Density and diversity. Nature 417: 698-699.
31. Tavili, A. and Jafari, M., 2009. Interrelations between plants and environmental variables. International Journal of Environmental Research, 3(2): 239-246. DOI: 10.22059/ijer.2009.51.
32. Thuiller, W., Georges, D., Engler, R., Breiner, F., Georges, M. D., &Thuiller, C. W. 2016.Package ‘biomod2’. Ensemble platform for species distribution modeling.
33. Welsch, D.L., Kroll, C.N., Mc Donnell, J.J., and Burns, D.A. 2001. Topographic controls on the chemistry of subsurface stormflow. Hydrol.Process. 15: 10. 1925-1938.
34. Western, A.W. 2004. Spatial correlation of soil moisture in small catchments and its relationship to dominant spatial hydrological processes. J. Hydrol. 286: 1-4. 113-134.
35. Whelan, M.J., and Gandolfi, C. 2002. Modeling of spatial controls on denitrification at the landscape scale. Hydrol.Process.16: 7.1437-1450.
36. - Wood, S. N., 2006. Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R, Chapman and Hall/CRC, USA.410 p.
37. Yilmaz, M., 2010. Is there a Future for the Isolated Oriental Beech (FagusorientalisLipsky) Forests in Southern Turkey?.ActaSilv.Lign. Hung. 6: 111-114.
38. Yimer, F., Ledin, S., and Abdelkadir, A. 2006. Soil property variations inrelation to topographic aspect and vegetation community in the south-eastern highlands of Ethiopia. Forest Ecology and Management, 232: 90-99.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:


XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Jafari A, Aliary F, Ahmadi K. Investigating the Effect of Topographic factors on the distribution of oriental beech in Hyrcanian forest, Iran. PEC. 2021; 8 (17) :71-88
URL: http://pec.gonbad.ac.ir/article-1-627-en.html

Volume 8, Issue 17 (2-2021) Back to browse issues page
مجله حفاظت زیست بوم گیاهان Journal of Plant Ecosystem Conservation
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 30 queries by YEKTAWEB 4311