[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 6, Issue 12 (12-2018) ::
PEC 2018, 6(12): 177-190 Back to browse issues page
Effects of growth stages on the nutritive value of Lilium ledebourii in Kelardasht and Asalem
Shekoofeh Shokrollahi * , Goholamali Heshmati , Hamed Yosefzade
Agriculture Sciences and Natural Resources University of Gorgan , shokrollahi.sh93@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (3474 Views)

Lilium ledebourii (Baker) Boiss has medicinal, ornamental value with high economic potential. It can be considered as a new flower that is extremely endangered.  Its wild populations are currently at the risk of rapid eradication because of irregular grazing, pest and poaching. Hence, the main purpose of this study was to determine the nutritional value of L. ledebourii in vegetative, flowering and seeding phenological stages. Samples were randomly selected in the mentioned stages with three replication. In any replication, five plants were selected from the aerial shoots of lily in Kelardasht and Asalem. Nutritional Value indices including crude protein (CP), Acid detergent fiber (ADF), dry matter digestibility (DMD), metabolic energy (ME) were also determined by standard method in the laboratory. General Linear Model was also used to compare the habitats and phenological stages. Duncan’s Multiple Range Test was applied to determine the source of variations within the groups. The results showed that the phonological stages have a significant effect on the nutritional value of Lily, and the nutritional value of vegetative stage is higher than that of the other stages in both habitats. As Crude protein, dry matter digestibility and metabolic energy content decreased from early growth to the end of growth  and ADF increased significantly with the growth progress. Also, the highest nutritional values were obtained from Kelardasht. Totally, L. ledebourii has favarable notrition value, especially at vegetative stages. It is essential to prevent grazing of livestock in its habitats to protect this plant.

Keywords: Nutritional Value, Growth Stage, Metabolic Energy, Lilium Ledebourii, Habitat
Full-Text [PDF 187 kb]   (737 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2017/06/16 | Accepted: 2018/01/2 | Published: 2018/11/24
References
1. Ahmadi A., Arzani H., Jafari A.A., 2005. Determination and composition of Forage Quality of Five Species in Different Phenological Stages in Alborz Rangelands.In: XX International Grassland Congress, Ireland, pp. 292.
2. Aliyev, J.A. 1995. Country Report to the FAO International Technical Conference on Plant Genetic Resources. URL: http://www.fao.org, 56p.
3. AOAC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 2000. Official Methods of Analysis, 7th Ed., (Animal Feed, chapter 4, p. 54): Arlington: AOAC International.
4. Azadi, P. and Khush-Khui, M. 2007. Micropropagation of Lilium ledebourii (Baker) Boiss as affected by plant growth regulator, sucrose concentration, harvesting season and cold treatments. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology. 10: 582–591. doi:10.2225/vol10-issue4-fulltext-7.
5. Bahr, L. R. and Compton, M. E. 2004. Competence for in vitro bulblet regeneration among eight Lilium genotypes. HortScience. 39: 127- 129.
6. Baytop, T. 1984. Türkiyede bitkiler ile tedavi (geçmişte ve bugün) (No. 40). İstanbul Üniversitesi.
7. Crispim. S., Cardoso, E.L. and Frandes, F.A., 2001. Seasonal variation of Brachiaria spp, quality in the pantanal of mato Grosso do sul, Brazil. Grassland congress. p: 380 -379.
8. Choi, CR. 2003. Dongeebokam-jabbeogpyun, pooreunsasang, Seoul, 785 pp.
9. DeWoody, J. and Hipkins, V. D. 2006. Genetic diversity and differentiation in western lily (Lilium occidentale). Unpublished report for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. National Forest Genetic Electrophoresis Laboratory, Placerville, California.
10. El-Shatnawi M.K., Mohawesh Y.M. 2000. Seasonal chemical composition of saltbush in semiarid grasslands of Jordan, J. Range Manage. 53, pp. 214-211.
11. Güney A. 1989. Türkiye’de parfüm bitkileri ve değerlendirme olanakları. Ege Üni. Ziraat Fak. Dergisi, 26(1): 2-1.
12. Holechek J.L., Herbel C.H., Pieper R.D., 2001. Range management Principle and Practices. Prentice Hall Pub. USA. Fourth Edition. 587 Pages.
13. Jalili, A. and J amzad, Z. 1999. Red data book of Iran. Research institute of forest and rangeland. Tehran, Iran, p: 748.
14. Kawagishi, K., & Miura, T. 1996. Changes in nutrient content of spring-planted edible lily (Lilium leichtlinii Hook f. var. maximowiczii Baker). Japanese Society for Horticultural Science. 65(2): 339-347.
15. Lee, K. A., Lee, J. Y., Lee, J. W., Lee, E. M., and Oh, M. J. 2007. Nutritional value of lily scales in Lilium lancifolium and Lilium davidii. Global Books J Food. 1: 344-346.
16. Linn J. Cuehn C. 1994. The effects of forage quality on performance and cost of feeding lactating dairy cows. University of Minnesota, Department of Animal Science. St. paul, MN. 9p.
17. Mc Donald P., Edwards R.A., Green Half J.F.D., Morgan C.A. 1996. Animal Nutrition. 5th ed. Longman. London .714p.
18. Mirmasoumi, M., Azadi, P., Sharafi, A., Ntui, V. O, Mii, M. 2013. Simple protocol for plant regeneration of Lilium ledebourii using transverse thin cell layer. Progress in Biological Sciences. 3: 117-122.
19. Naseri, S., Adibi, M.A., and Kianian, M.K. 2017. Forage Quality of Endangered Species of Astragalus fridae Rech. F. in Semnan Province, Iran. Journal of Rangeland Science, 7(4), 393-405.
20. Oddy V.U., Roberts G.E., Low S.G. 1983. Prediction of In-vivo Dry Matter Digestibility from the Fiber and Nitrogen Content of a Feed, Common Wealth Agriculture Bureux. Australia, 295-298.
21. Özçelik, H., Ay, G. and Öztürk, M. 1990. Doğu ve Güneydoğu Anadolu’nun ekonomik yönden önemli bazı bitkileri. 10. Ulusal Biyoloji Kongresi, pp.18-20.
22. Standing Committee on Agriculture (SCA), CSIRO, 1990. Melbourne, Australia, 266pp.
23. Uniyal S.kr., Awasthil A. Rawat G.S. 2005. Biomass availability and Forage quality of Eurotia ceratoides Mey. in the rangelands of Changthang, eastern Ladakh. Current Science, 89(1),10 July
24. Van Soest P.G. 1963. Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. Preparation of fiber residues of low nitrogen content. Dairy Science. 46(5):829-835.
25. Weiler, T. C. 1992. Easter Lilies. In: Larson, R. A. (ed.) Introduction to Floriculture. Academic Press, INC. New York. pp. 333-364.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

shokrollahi S, Heshmati G, Yosefzade H. Effects of growth stages on the nutritive value of Lilium ledebourii in Kelardasht and Asalem. PEC 2018; 6 (12) :177-190
URL: http://pec.gonbad.ac.ir/article-1-345-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 6, Issue 12 (12-2018) Back to browse issues page
مجله حفاظت زیست بوم گیاهان Journal of Plant Ecosystem Conservation
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645