|
1. Almeida-Cortez J.S., Shipley B., Arnason J.T. 1999. Do plant species with high relative growth rates have poorer chemical defences. Func Ecol 13(6):819–827. 2. Arias D. 2007. Calibration of LAI- 2000 to estimate leaf area index and assessment of its relationship with stand productivity in six native and introduced tree species in Costa Rica. Forest Ecology and Management, 247: 185-193. 3. Arzani H., Sahragard P., Torkan J., Saedi K. 2010. Comparison of Phenological Stages on Forage Quality of Rangelands Species in Rangeland of Saral Kordestan. Journal of Rangeland. 4(2): 160-167. 4. Bradley J., Butterfield T., Katharine N.S. 2013. Single-trait functional indices outperform multi-trait indices in linking environmental gradients and ecosystem services in a complex landscape. Journal of Ecology 10: 9–17. 5. Chanteloup, P., Bonis A. 2013. Functional diversity in root and above-ground traits in a fertile grassland shows a detrimental effect on productivity. Basic and Applied Ecology. 14(3): 208–216. 6. Conti, G., Diaz, S. 2013. Plant functional diversity and carbon storage – an empirical test in semi-arid forest ecosystems. Journal of Ecology, 101: 18–28. 7. Cornelissen J.H.C., Lavorel S, Garnier E., Díaz S., Buchmann N., Gurvich D.E.,Reich P.B., Ter Steege H., Morgan H.D., Heijden M.G.A., van der Pausas J.G.,Poorter H. .2003. A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust. J. Bot. 51: 335–380. 8. CSIRO. 1990. Feeding standards for Australian livestock: ruminants. Standing Committee on Agriculture and Resource Management. Ruminants subcommittee. Melbourne, 266 p. 9. Diaz, S., Cabido, M. 2001. Vive la difference: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends Ecol. 16(11): 646–655. 10. Díaz S., Lavorel S., De Bello F., Quétier F., Grigulis K., Robson, M. 2007.Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service
assessments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104:20684–20689. 11. Diaz S., Lavorel S., Stuart Chapin F., Tecco P.A., Gurvich D.E., Grigulist K. 2007 Functional diversity—at the crossroads between ecosystem functioning and environmental filters. In: Canadell JG, Pataki DE, Pitelka LF (eds) Terrestrial ecosystems in a changing world. 12. Garnier E., Cortez J., Billeos G., Navas M.L., Roumet C., Debussche M., Laurent G., Blanchard A., Aubry D., Bellmann A., Neill C., Toussaint J.P. 2004. Plant functional markers capture ecosystem properties during secondary succession.Ecology 85(9): 2630–2637. 13. Garnier E., Shipley B., Roumet C., Laurent G. 2001. A standardized protocol for the determination of specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content. Func Ecol 15:688–695 14. Grime J.P. 1998. Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: Immediate, filter and founder effects. Journal of Ecology, 86: 891–899. 15. Hector A., Schmid B., Beierkuhnlein C.1999. Plant diversity and productivity experiments in European grasslands. Science, 286: 1123–1127. 16. Hooper D.U.F., Chapin S., Ewel J.J., Hector A., Inchausti P., Lavorel S., Lawton J.H., Lodge D.M., Loreau M., Naeem S., Schmid B., Setälä H., Symstad A.J.,Vandermeer J., Wardle D.A. 2005. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol.Monogr. 75: 3–35.http://www.orchidsflora.com/medicinalherbsseed.html 17. Hu Y., Li, K., Gong H., Yin W. 2009. Plant diversity-productivity patterns in the alpine steppe environment. Journal of arid land, VOL. 1, NO. 1, 43−48. 18. Jangjo M., Khajee H., Anvarkhan S., Sanjni S. 2013. Seed germination and dormancy tests of some rangeland species of Northern Khorasan province, Iran.Intl. J. Agri. Crop Sci. 5(1): 21-29. 19. Lavorel S., Diaz S., Cornelissen J.H, Garnier E., Harrison S.P., McIntyre S., Pausas J., Pérez N., Roumet C., Urcelay C. 2007. Plant functional types: Are we getting any closer to the Holy Grail? In: Canadell J.G., Pataki D., Pitelka L.Springer, New York 20. Lavorel S., Grigulis K.., Lamarque P., Colace M.P., Garden D., Girel J., Pellet G.,Douzet R. 2011. Using plant functional traits to understand the landscape distribution of multiple ecosystem services. Journal of Ecology 99: 135–147. 21. Loreau M., Naeem S., Inchausti P., Bengtsson J., Grime J.P., Hector, A. 2001.Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: Current knowledge and future challenges. Science, 294, 804–808. 22. Magurran, A.E. 1988. Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA. 23. Mazandarani M., Kassaei M., Rezaee B. 2003. Medicinal plants in Ziarat Mountain Gorgan. Iranian Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research. 20: 40-58. 24. Mokany K., Ash J., Roxburgh S. 2008. Functional identity is more important than diversity in influencing ecosystem processes in a temperate native grassland.Journal of Ecology, 96: 884–893. 25. Mouillot D., Villéger S., Scherer-Lorenzen M., Mason N.W.H. 2011. Functional structure of biological communities predicts ecosystem multi functionality.PLoS ONE, 6, e17476. 26. Niromand E., Jami M., Zamani, G. 2012. Responses of quality Lathyrus sativus L.in Birjand. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research Vol. 9, No.4,. 678-684. 27. Oddy, V.H., Robards, G.E., Low, S.G. 1983. Prediction of invivo dry matter digestibility from the fiber nitrogen content of a feed, In Feed Information and Animal Production, eds. G.E. Robards, and R.G. Pakham ommonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Australia, pp. 395-398. 28. Pla L., Casanoves F., Rienzo J.D. 2012. Quantifying Functional Biodiversity. ISBN 978-94-007-2647-5. 29. Rao CR. 1982. Diversity and dissimilarity coefficients: a unified approach. Theor Popul. Biol. 21: 24–43. 30. Schumacher J., Roscher C. 2009. Differential effects of functional traits on aboveground biomass in semi-natural grasslands. Oikos, 118: 1659-1668. 31. Tilman D., Knops J., Wedin D., Reich P., Ritchie M., Siemann E. 1997. The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes.Science, 277: 1300–1302. 32. Van Soest P.J. 1982. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant Books, Ins. Corvallis,375 p. 33. Walker B.H., Kinzig A., Langridge J.L. 1999. Plant attribute diversity, resilience,and ecosystem function: the nature and significance of dominant and minor species. Ecosystems 2: 95–113.
|
