[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 8, Issue 16 (8-2020) ::
PEC 2020, 8(16): 135-153 Back to browse issues page
Cutting down and pollarding of forest trees as perceived by local and governmental forest stakeholders and the impact of changes in fuel source on the forest (Case of Sarvabad Forests)
Soroush Zabihollahi11 , Javad Mirzaei * , Farzad Eskandari3 , Manuchehr Namiranian4 , Arezoo Soltani5
1- ilam uni
ilam uni , mirzaei.javad@gmail.com
3- kurdistan uni
4- tehran uni
5- Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Abstract:   (3017 Views)
Local people are always dependent on cutting down and pollarding of Zagros forests trees to provide their livelihoods needs such as house heating, cooking, supply of livestock forage and building materials. The stakeholders also have many conflicts in terms of forest utilization, which is in turn the main cause of many irregularities in the forest management. The present study was conducted to investigate the views of local and governmental forest stakeholders on the cutting down and pollarding of forest trees in the Almaneh village, Sarvabad city of Kurdistan province. The main data source was a questionnaire validity of which was evaluated based on the opinions of specialists and its reliability measured through Cronbach's coefficient. In total, the views of 115 local and governmental stakeholders were studied using a Likert scale. All data were analaysed using SPSS. In so dong, Kruskal wallis and Mann whitney tests were taken and analyzed. As the results show, local stakeholders perceived that forest trees are not severely cut down and pollarded compared to the past (stakeholder percieved cutting and pollarding 2.3 and 4.1 on avarage respectively). They also believed  utilization of the trees is limited to the collection of dead trees. This does not damage the forest (Average stakeholder views were 4.03 on avarage). They believed the state should not prohibit them from carrying out these  activities. Despite the confirmation of the decline in these utilities in recent years, the natural resources specialists, (the stakeholder viewed cutting and pollarding 3.14 and 3.9 on average respectively), have found forests deconstruction, and bilateral participation necessary in this regard. In total, our results showed some conflicts of reading between the locally independent stakeholders and the governmentally dependent stakeholders. In spite of the conflict of views between the two groups, stakeholders reported the positive impact of entering the gas into the village and changing the source of livestock forage in general (stakeholder percieved cutting and pollarding 3.79 and 4.1 on avarege  respectively).
Keywords: Forest utilization, Conflict, Fuel wood, Kurdistan, Almaneh
Full-Text [PDF 288 kb]   (764 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2019/11/12 | Accepted: 2020/03/3 | Published: 2020/09/21
References
1. Amacher, G.S., Hyde, W.F., Kanel, K.R. 1999. Nepali fuelwood production and consumption: Regional and household distinctions, Substitution and successful intervention. Journal of Development Studies, 35(4), 138-163.
2. Brouwer, R., Falcao, M.P. 2004. Wood fuel consumption in Maputo, Mozambique. Journal of Biomass and Bioenergy, 27(3): 233-245.
3. Daniels S.E., Walker, G.B. 1996. Collaborative learning: Improving public deliberation in ecosystem-based management. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 16(2): 71-102.
4. Dovie, D.K., Witkowski, E.T.F., Shackleton, C. 2004. The Fuelwood Crisis in southern Africa: Relating Fuelwood Use to Livelihoods in a Rural Village. Journal of Geo Journal, 60(2), 123-133.
5. Guo, J., Gong, P. 2019. Assessing the impacts of rising fuelwood demand on Swedish forest sector: An intertemporal optimization approach. Forest Policy and Economics, 105: 91-98.
6. Khosravi, Sh., Maleknia, R., Khedrizadeh, M. 2017. Understanding the Contribution of Non-timber Forest Products to the Livelihoods of Forest Dwellers in the Northern Zagros in Iran. Small-scale Forestry, 16(2): 235-248.
7. Nagothu, U.S. 2001. Fuelwood and fodder extraction and deforestation: mainstream views in India discussed on the basis of data from the semi-arid region of Rajasthan. Journal of Geoforum, 32(3): 319-332.
8. Purnomo, H., Yasmi, Y., Prabhu, R., Hakim, S., Jafar, A., Suprihatin, h. 2003. Collaborative modelling to support forest management: qualitative systems analysis at Lumut Mountain, Indonesia. Small-scale, Journal of Forest Economics, Management and Policy, 2(2): 259-275.
9. Scholz, R.W. 2011. Environmental Literacy in Science and Society: From Knowledge to Decisions. Cambridge University Press, 421 p.
10. Schwarzbauer, P., Stern, T. 2010. Energy vs. material, Economic impacts of a “wood for-energy scenario” on the forest-based sector in Austria: A simulation approach. Journal of Forest Policy and Economics, 12(1) 31-38.
11. Soltani, A., Angelsen, A., Eid, T. 2014. Poverty, forest dependence and forest degradation links: evidence from Zagros, Iran. Journal of Environment and Development Economics, 19: 607-630.
12. Soltani, A., Sankhayan, P.L., and Hofstad, O. 2016. Playing forest governance games: State-village conflict in Iran. Journal of Forest Policy and Economics, 73: 251-261.
13. Soloviy, I., Melnykovych, M., Gurung, A.B., Hewittd, R.J., Ustyche, R., Maksymiva, L., Brangf, P., Meesseng, H., Kaflyk, M. 2019. Innovation in the use of wood energy in the Ukrainian Carpathians: Opportunities and threats for rural communities. Forest Policy and Economics, 104: 160-169.
14. Treiber, M.U., Grimsby, L.K., Aune, J.B. 2015. Reducing energy poverty through increasing choice of fuels and stoves in Kenya: Complementing the multiple fuel model. Journal of Energy for Sustainable Development, 27:54-62
15. Troncoso, K., Castillo, A., Masera, O., Merino, L. 2007. Social perceptions about a technological innovation for fuelwood cooking: Case study in rural Mexico. Journal of Energy Policy, 35(5), 2799-2810.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Zabihollahi1 S, mirzaei J, eskandari F, Namiranian M, soltani A. Cutting down and pollarding of forest trees as perceived by local and governmental forest stakeholders and the impact of changes in fuel source on the forest (Case of Sarvabad Forests). PEC 2020; 8 (16) :135-153
URL: http://pec.gonbad.ac.ir/article-1-628-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 8, Issue 16 (8-2020) Back to browse issues page
مجله حفاظت زیست بوم گیاهان Journal of Plant Ecosystem Conservation
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645