:: Volume 1, Issue 1 ((Volume 1 - No. 1 - Spring 2013) - Article Numbers: 7 Article(s) 2013) ::
PEC 2013, 1(1): 87-103 Back to browse issues page
Forage quality of important range species in Pashaylogh-e-Maravetapeh rangeland ecosystem in Golestan province
Hossein Arzani , Javad Motamedi (Torkan) * , Reza Yari , Yaser Ghasemi Aryan , Jamshid Khatir Nameni
, motamedi.torkan@gmail.com
Abstract:   (13236 Views)

Abstract

Information regarding forage quality index is of paramount importance in animal and rangeland management. Hence, the quality of important common forage species in Pashaylogh-e-Maravetapeh rangelands was determined. In the present study, 18 rangeland species were sampled at three different phenological stages (vegetation, flowering, seeding) in 2009. All of these species were among the most important plant types of the study site. Forage quality indexes namely crude protein (CP), acid detergent fiber (ADF), dry matter digestibility (DMD) and metabolisable energy (ME) were determined to meet animal maintenance requirements. Analysis of variance was used to compare the indexes among species and different growth stages. Specific differences were evaluated using Duncan's test. The results showed that the average crude protein for vegetation, flowering and seeding stages were 17.70, 14.91 and 8.96%, respectively. However, it was the highest in the phenological stages and even lower than the critical level (7.0%) to meet an animal unit maintenance requirement. Average dry matter digestibility values for different phenological stages were 68.01, 64.89 and 55.84% with values higher than the critical amount (50%) for all phenological stages to meet animal maintenance requirements. Metabolism energy in vegetation, flowering and seeding stages were 9.56, 9.03 and 7.49 Mj/Kg/DM respectively with higher values for vegetation and flowering stages and values even lower than the critical level (8Mj) to meet an animal unit maintenance requirement in seeding stages. This suggests that the desirable quality of pasture forage at different times of grazing is not the same and the determination of daily animal unit requirements based on forage quality is needed. It is clear that forage quality varies as the weather changes, but since determining forage quality is costly, the results of this research can be used to estimate animal requirements throughout the year.

Keywords: Forage quality, Daily animal requirements, Phenological stage, Crude protein, Dry matter digestible, Metabolisable energy, Pashaylogh-e-Maravehtapeh rangelands.
Full-Text [PDF 620 kb]   (3159 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2013/02/4 | Accepted: 2013/06/14 | Published: 2013/06/21
References
1. Ainalis A.B., Tsiouvaras C.N., Nastis A.S. 2006. Effect of summer grazing on forage quality of woody and herbaceous species in a silvopastoral system in northen Greece, Journal of Arid Environments, 67: 90-99.
2. Arzani H., Motamedi (Torkan) J., Zare Chahoki M.A. 2010. Report of national project “Forage quality of range species in Iran”, Organization of Forests,Rangelands and Watershed Management of Iran, 230p.
3. Arzani H., Ahmadi Z., Azarnivand H., Bihamta M.R. 2010. Forage quality of three life forms species in semi arid and semi humid regions in different phonological stages, Journal of Desert, 15: 71-74. (In Persian)
4. Arzani H., 2009. Forage Quality and Daily Requirement of Grazing Animal,University of Tehran, 354p.
5. Arzani H., Naseri, K.L. 2009. Livestock Feeding on Pasture (Translated),University of Tehran press, 2 Edition, 299p.
6. Arzani H., Nikkhah A., Azarnivand A. 2007. Report of national project “Determination of animal unit weight and animal requirement in rangelands of Iran”, 132p.
7. Arzani H., Basiri M., Khatibi F., Ghorbani G. 2006. Nutritive value of some Zagros mountain rangeland species. Small Rumi., Rese., 65:128-135.
8. Arzani H., Zohdi M., Fisher E., Zaheddi Amiri G.H., Nikkhah A., Wester D. 2004.Phenological effects on forage quality of five grass species, Journal of Range Management, 57: 624-630.
9. Arzani H. 1994. Some aspects of estimating short term and long term rangeland carrying capacity in the western division of New South Wals. Ph.D.Thesis,University of New South Wals, Australia, 308p.
10. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC), 2000. Official Methods of Analysis, 7th Ed., Animal Feed, chapter 4, p.54: Arlington: AOAC International.
11. Atrian P. 2009. Sheep Nutrition, First edition, Aeej press, 348p.
12. Baars R.M.T. 2002. Rangeland utilization assessment and modeling for grazing and fire management, Journal of Enviromental Management, 64: 377-386.
13. Baghestani Maibodi N., Arzani H., Zare M.T., Abdollahi J. 2004. Forage quality of some range plant species in Posht-Kooh area of Yazd Province. Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research 11:137-162. (In Persian).
14. Beck J.L., Peek J.M., Strand E.K. 2006. Estimates of elk summer range nutritional carrying capacity constrained by probabilities of habitat selection, Journal of Wildlife Management. 70: 283–294.
15. Bothrot M.H. 1985. Beef Cattle Nutrition and Tropical Pastures. Longman London, 360p.
16. Chen C.S., Wang S.M., Chang Y.K. 2001. Climatic factors, acid detergent fiber,natural detergent fiber and crude protein contents in digitgrass. Proceeding of the XIX International Grassland Congress, Brezil, pp: 632-634.
17. Corbett J.L. 1987. Energy and protein utilization by grazing animals. In: Wheeler J.L., Pearson C.J., Roberts G.E. Editors, Temperate Pastures, Their Production,Use and Management, Australian Wool Corporation, Collingswood. Vic., pp:415-422.
18. Crispim S., Cardoso M.A., Frandes F.A. 2001. Seasonal variation of Brachiaria spp., quality in the pantanal of mato Grosso do sul, Brazil. Grassland congress.pp: 379- 380.
19. El-Shatnawi M.K., Mohawesh Y.M. 2000. Seasonal chemical composition of saltbush in semiarid grasslands of Jordan, Journal of Range Management.53:211-214.
20. Farahpour M., Fayaz M., Ghasriyani F. 2011. Final report of available forage of rangelad in Iran, Organization of Forests, Rangelands and Watershed Management of Iran, 430p.
21. French C.E., McEwen L.C., Magruder N.D., Ingram R.H., Swift R.W. 1955.Nutritional requirements of white-tailed deer for growth and antler development, State College in Penn, Penn. Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull., 600p.
22. Ganskopp D., Bohnert D. 2001. Nutritional dynamics of seven northern Great basin grasses, Journal of Range Management. 54: 640-647.
23. Garza A., Fulbright T.E. 1988. Comparative chemical composition of armed saltbush and fourwing saltbush. Journal of Range Management, 43: 401-403.
24. Gonzalez-Hernandez M.P., Silva-Pando F.J. 1999. Nutritional attributes of understory plants known as components of deer diets, Journal of Range Management. 52:132-138.
25. Goreallen V., Segarra E. 2001. Anti-quality factors in rangeland and pastureland forages, Bulletin 73 of the Idaho Forest, Wildlife and Range Experiment Station University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, 83: 844-1130.
26. Heady H.F., Denis R.D. 1994. Range Land and Ecology and Management. West View Press. USA., 520p.
27. Holechek J.L., Pieper R.D., Herbel C.H. 2004. Range Management Principles and Practices, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliff, 587p.
28. Jafari M., Javadi M.R., Hamadanian F., Ghorbani, M. 2008. Saltland Pastures:(Translated), University of Tehran press, First edition, 269p.
29. Karen J.E., Sue J.M., Richard J.D. 2006. Karoo Veld: Ecology and Management,Briza publication, Pretoria, South Africa, 231p.
30. Leen J., Martin N.P. 2004. Forage quality tests and interpretation. Agriculture,Food and Environment Sciences.
31. Licitra G., Carpino S., Schadt I., Avondo M., Barresi, S. 1997. Forage quality of native pastures in a Mediterranean area. Animal Feed Science Technology 69:315-328.
32. Minson D.J. 1987. Estimation of the nutritive value of forage, in temperate pastures, their production, use and management, Eds. Wheeler J.L., Pearson C.J., Roberts G.E., Australian Wool Corporation, pp: 415-422.
33. Nikkhah A., Amanlo H. 1995. Principles of Livestock Nutrition and Feeding: First edition, University of Zanjan Press, 935p.
34. NRC 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle, National Academy Press,Washington, DC, USA, 381p.
35. Oddy V.U., Robards G.E., Low S.G. 1983. Predicion of In – vivo dry matter digestibility from the fibre and nitrogen content of a feed, In Feed Information and Animal Production. Eds. Robards G.E., Packham R.G. Common Wealth Agricultural Bureux. Australia, P: 295-298.
36. Pearson R.A., Archibald R.F., Muirhead R.H. 2006. A comparison of the effect of forage type and level of feeding on the digestibility and gastrointestinal mean retention time of dry forage given to cattle, sheep, ponies and donkeys, British Journal of Nutrition, 95: 88-98.
37. Rauzi F. 1975. Seasonal yield and chemical composition of crested wheat grass in south eastern Wyeminy, Journal of Range Management, 28: 211-219.
38. Richardson F.D. 2004. Simulation models of rangelands production systems (simple and complex), Ph.D. Thesis In Applied Mathematices, University of Cape Town, South Africa, 320p.
39. Richardson F.D., Hahn B.D., Schoeman S.J. 2000. Modeling nutrient utilization by livestock grazing semi-arid rangeland, In McNamara J.P., France J., and Beever D., Eds. Modelling Nutrient Utilization in Farm Animals, pp: 263-280. CABI,Wallingford, Oxon.

XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 1, Issue 1 ((Volume 1 - No. 1 - Spring 2013) - Article Numbers: 7 Article(s) 2013) Back to browse issues page