:: Volume 6, Issue 13 (3-2019) ::
PEC 2019, 6(13): 141-154 Back to browse issues page
Investigating the Effects of Eco-cover on Unwanted Plant Control, Vetiver Grass Growth and Soil Properties
Hamid Niknahad-Gharmakher * , Masoumeh Ahmadi Beni
1Assistant Professor of Rangeland and Watershed Management Faculty. Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran. , niknahad@gau.ac.ir
Abstract:   (3276 Views)
Eco-cover is ecological mulch and its application is an eco-friendly and low-cost method to improve soil environment and prevention of unwanted plants. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of eco-cover on unwanted plants, Vetiver grass (Chrysopogon zizanioides) growth and soil Properties. For this purpose, two series of rectangular plot (with and without eco-cover), in three replicates were established. Six seedling of Vetiver grass were planted in each plot and  at the end of the growing season, the number of unwanted plants in each plot was counted and weighed. The effect of eco-cover on the growth of Vetiver grass seedlings was investigated by measuring the mean length of roots, height, and canopy cover of seedlings. Soil properties were investigated using two series of rectangular plot (with and without eco-cover) that stablished in three replicates for six months. Two soil samples were taken from each plot and in the laboratory, some soil physical, chemical and biological properties were determined. Statistical analysis was performed using version 18 of SPSS software and T test method. The results demonstrated that the mean of weight, canopy cover and percentage of survival Vetiver grass individuals has been increased significantly (p<0.05) as a result of eco-cover application. Moreover, a significant decrease (p<0.05) in  the number of unwanted plants  was observed, too. A significant decrease (P<0.05) in the mean of the percentage of saturated humidity and total nitrogen and a significant increase in the mean of the absorbable phosphorous and exchangeable magnesium of soil were noted (P<0.05).
Keywords: Rangeland Restoration, Ecological Mulch, Vetiver Grass (Chrysopogon zizanioides)
Full-Text [PDF 196 kb]   (617 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2017/05/26 | Accepted: 2018/04/24 | Published: 2019/05/3
References
1. Abdin, O.A., Zhou, X.M., Cloutier, D., Coulman, D.C., Faris, M.A. and Smith, D.L. 2000. Cover crop and interrow tillage for weed control in short season maize (Zea mays). European Journal of Agronomy, 12:93-102.
2. Baker, J.T. 1998. Interaction of poultry litter, polyethylene mulch and floating row covers on triploid watermelon, Journal of the American Society Horticultural Science, 33(5):810-813.
3. Bond, W. and Grundy, C. 2001. Non-chemical weed management in organic farming systems. Weed Researc, 41:383-405.
4. Bot, A. and Benites, J. 2005. The importance of soil organic matter. Key to drought – resistant soil and and sustained food roduction. FAO Soils Bulletin 80 p.
5. Bouyoucos,G.J. 1962. Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analysis of soils. Agron. J. 54: 464–465
6. Buhler, D.D., Gunsolus, J.L. and Ralston, D.F. 1992. Integrated weed management techniques to reduce herbicide inputs in soybean. Agronomy Journal, 84: 973-978.
7. Buhler, D.D. 1996. Development of alternative of weed management strategies. Journal of Production Agriculture, 9: 501-504.
8. Burgess, P.J., Nkomaula, J.C. and Medeiros-Ramos, A.L. 1997. Root distribution and water use in a four -year old silvoarable system. Agroforestry Forum, 8:15–18.
9. Canals, R.M. and Sebastia, M.T. 2000. Analyzing mechanisms regulating diversity in rangelands through comparative studies: a case in the southwestern Pyrennees. Conservation Biology, 2(7): 965-984.
10. Chakraborty,D.,Nagarajan,S.,Aggarwal, p., Gupta,V.K. ,Tomar,R.K. ,Garg,R.N., Sahoo,R.N., Sarkar,A., Chopra,U.K.,Sarma,K.S.S. and Karla, N. 2008.
11. Effect of mulching on soil and plat water status, and the growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum) in a semi-arid environment. Agricultural Water Management, 95:1323-1334.
12. Chalker-Scott, L. 2007. Impact of mulches on landscape plants and the environment – a review. Journal of Environmental Horticulture, 25(4): 239-249.
13. El-Sheikh, M.A. 2005. Plant succession on abandoned fields after 25 years of shifting cultivation in Assuit, Egypt. Journal of Arid Environment, 61: 461-481.
14. Evans, E. 2000; Mulching trees and shrubs. North Carolina State University.http://www.ces.ncsu.edu/depts/hort/consumer/factsheets/trees-new/text/muching.html
15. Famiglietti, J.S., Rudnicki, J.W. and Rodell, M. 1998. Variability in surface moisture content along a hillslope transect: Rattlesnake Hill, Texas. Journal of Hydrology, 210: 259-281.
16. Fausett, J.B. and Rom, C.R. 2001. The effects of transitioning a mature high-density orchard from standard herbicide ground-cover management system to organic ground-cover management systems. Arkansas Agriculture. Expert. Station. Research. Series, 483:33–36.
17. Foo, C.L. Harrington, K.C. and MacKay, M.B. 2010. Comparison of weed control techniques to establish three ground cover species. New Zealand Plant Protection, 63: 96-101.
18. Gaoa, J.F., Maa, K.M., Fenga, Z.W., Qia J. and Fenga, Y. 2009. Coupling effects of altitude and human disturbance on landscape and plant diversity in the vicinity of mountain villages of Beijing, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 29 (1): 56-61.
19. Gan, J., Zhu,Y., Wilen, C., Pittenger, D. and Crowley, D. 2003. Effect of planting covers on herbicide persistence in landscape soils. Environ. Sci. Tech. 37:2775–2779.
20. Ghosh, P.K., Dayal, D., Bandyopadhaya, K.K., and Mohanty, M. 2006. Evaluation of strawe and polythene mulch for enhancing productivity of irrigated summer groundnut, Field Crops Research, 99:78-86.
21. Gouin, F.R. 1983. Over-mulching a national plague. Weeds, Trees and Turf, 22(9):22-24.
22. Green, T.L. and Watson. G.W. 1989. Effects of turfgrass and mulch on establishment and growth of bareroot sugar maples. Journal of Arboriculture, 15:268–272.
23. Greenly, K. and Rakow, D.A. 1995. The effect of wood mulch type and depth on weed and tree growth and certain soil parameters Journal of Arboriculture, 21(5): 225-232.
24. Greenly, K. and Rakow D.A. 1995. The effect of wood mulch type and depth on weed and tree growth and certain soil parameters. Journal of Arboriculture, 21(5): 225-232.
25. Haapala,T., Palonen, P., Korpela, A. and Ahokas, J. 2014. Feasibility of paper mulches in crop production: a review. Agricultural and food science, 23:60 – 79.
26. Harrington, K.C. and Bedford,T.A. 2004. Control of weeds by paper mulch in vegetables and trees. Newzealand. Plant Protection, 57:37-40.
27. Hobbs, R.J. and Huenneke, L.F. 1992. Disturbance, Diversity and Invasion: Implication for Conservation. Conservation Biology, 6(3): 324-337.
28. Hudu, A.I., Futuless, K.N., and Gworgwor, N.A. 2002. Effect of mulching intensity on the growth and yield of irrigated tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) and weed infestation in semi- arid zone of Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 21: 1: 37- 45.
29. Jodaugiene, D., Pupaliene, R., Urboniene, M., Prankietis, V., and Pranckietiene, I. 2006. The impact of different types of organic mulches on weed emergence. Agronomy Research, 4, 197-201.
30. Kumar, K., Tripathi, S.K.and Bhatia, K.S. 1995. Erodibility characteristics of Rendhar Watershed soils of Bundelkhand. Indian Journal of Soil Conservation. 23:1.200-204.
31. Litzow, M. and Pellett, H. 1983. Influence of mulch materials on growth of green ash. Journal of Arboriculture, 9(1): 7-11.
32. McLean, E.O. 1988. Soil pH and lime requirement. In: Page, A.L. (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part, American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wis., Pp. 199-224.
33. Nelson, D.W. and Sommers, L.E. 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. In: Page, A.L., Miller, R.H., and Keeney, D.R. (Eds.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2, Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Agronomy Monograph No. 9, 2nd ed. American Society of Agronomy Inc., Madison, WI (Chapter 29), pp. 539–577.
34. Niknahad Gharmakher, M., Piutti, S., Machet, J.M., Benizri, E., and Recous, S. 2012. Mineralization-immobilization of sulphur in a soil during decomposition of plant residues of varied chemical composition and S content. Plant and Soil. 360: 2. 391-404.
35. Olsen, S.R., Cole, C.V., Watanabe, F.S. and Dean, L.A. 1954. Estimation of available P in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA circular. 939:1-19.
36. Page, M.C., Sparks, D.L. Woll, M.R. and Hendricks, G.J. 1987. Kinetics and mechanisms of potassium release from sandy Middle Atlantic coastal plain Soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 51:1460-1465.
37. Page, A.L., Miller, R.H. and Jeeney, D.R. 1992b. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. Chemical and mineralogical properties. SSSA Pub., Madison. 1159 p.
38. Rahman, A.M., Chikushi, J., Saifizzaman, M., and Lauren, J.G. 2005. Rice straw mulching and nitrogen of no-till wheat following rice in Bangladesh. Field Crops Research, 91: 71-81.
39. Ramakrishna, A., Hoang Minh, T., Wani, S.P. and Tranh Ding, L. 2006. Effect of mulch on soil temperature, moisture, weed infestation, and yield of groundnut in northern Vietnam. Field Crop Research, 95, 115-125.
40. Riechers, G.H., Beyers, J.L., Robichaud, P.R., Jennings, K., Kreutz, E., and Moll, J. 2008. Effects of Three Mulch Treatments on Initial Postfire Erosion in North-Central Arizona. USDA Forest Service Gen. Technical Report, 189: 107- 114.
41. Schupp, J.R. and McCue, J.J. 1996. Effect of five weed control methods on growth an fruiting of McIntosh / M.7 apple trees. Journal of Tree fruit production,1: 1-14.
42. Singogo, W., Lamont, W.J., and Marr, C.W. 1996. Fall planted crop support good yield of muskmelons. Horticulture Science, 31:62-64.
43. Smith, M.W., Carroll, B.L. and Cheary, B.S. 2000. Mulch improves pecan tree growth during orchard establishment. Hortticulture Science, 35: 192-195.
44. Swanton, C.J. and Weise, S.F. 1991. Integrated weed management the rationale and approach. Weed Technology, 5: 657-663.
45. Taber, H.G. 1993. Early muskmelon production with wavenlength-selective and clear plastic mulches. Horticulture technology, 3(1): 70-80.
46. Teasdale, J.R. and Mohler, C.L. 2000. The quantitative relationship between weed emergence and the physical properties of mulches, Weed Science, 48:385-392.
47. Uchinoa, H., Iwamaa, K., Jitsuyamaa, Y., Ichiyamaa, K., Sugiuraa, E., Yudatea, T., Nakamuraa, S. and Gopal, J. 2012. Effect of interseeding cover crops and fertilization on weed suppression under an organic and rotational cropping system, 1. Stability of weed suppression over years and main crops of potato, maize and soybean. Field Crops Research, 127: 9–16.
48. Watson, G.W. 1988. Organic mulch and grass competition influence tree root development. Journal of Arboriculture, 14:200–203.

XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 6, Issue 13 (3-2019) Back to browse issues page