:: Volume 6, Issue 13 (3-2019) ::
PEC 2019, 6(13): 77-90 Back to browse issues page
Investigating Economic and Social Consequences of Mining and its Effect on Livelihoods Status of Ranchers (Case Study: Ghorveh - Kurdistan Province Rangelands)
Farzad Ahmadi * , Fatemeh Shafiee
MSc. Student, Department of Range and Watershed Management, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran , farzadahmadigh70@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (3218 Views)

Mining in natural ecosystems, including rangelands, has many economic and social consequences, which leads to the degradation of pastures and changes in livelihoods of the inhabitants of the region. The purpose of this study was to investigate the economic and social consequences of extraction of mines and their impact on livelihood of ruminants in Ghorveh city. The number of samples were estimated using the Cochran formula and matching the Krejcy and Morgan tables. The findings of this study indicate that there is a positive and significant relationship between the social and economic consequences of extraction of mines with the livelihood of rangers. Also, the results of stepwise regression showed that the variables (economic, social, and livestock effects indicators) explain 64% of the variance in livelihood of rangers. In addition, with regard to beta coefficients, the index of economic consequences of mining operations has the highest share in the subsistence of livelihood.

Keywords: Economic and social consequences, Mine, Ranchers, Ghorveh city
Full-Text [PDF 166 kb]   (673 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2016/10/30 | Accepted: 2018/04/10 | Published: 2019/05/3
References
1. Al Rawashdeh R., Campbell G., Titi A. 2016. The socio-economic impacts of mining on local communities: The case of Jordan. The Extractive Industries and Society, 3(2), 494-507.
2. Avcı D., Adaman F., Özkaynak B. 2010. Valuation languages in environmental conflicts: How stakeholders oppose or support gold mining at Mount Ida, Turkey. Ecological Economics, 70(2), 228-238.
3. Bebbington A. 2010. Extractive industries and stunted states: conflict, responsibility and institutional change in the Andes. Corporate social responsibility: Comparative critiques, 97-116.‏
4. Bebbington A., Bebbington D.H., Bury J., Lingan J., Muñoz J.P., Scurrah M. 2008. Mining and social movements: struggles over livelihood and rural territorial development in the Andes. World Development, 36(12), 2888-2905.‏
5. Berkes F., Colding J., Folke C. (Eds.). 2008. Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press.
6. Bodin Ö., Crona B.I. 2009. The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference?. Global environmental change, 19(3), 366-374.‏
7. Bustos B., Folchi M., Fragkou M. 2016. Coal mining on pastureland in Southern Chile; challenging recognition and participation as guarantees for environmental justice. Geoforum.
8. Cochran. W. G, 1977. Sampling techiques, 3nd edition, Whley and Sons, USA, 428 pp.
9. Custodio. E, M. del Carmen Cabrera, R.Poncela, L. O. Puga, E. Skupien, & A. del Villar, 2016. Groundwater intensive exploitation and mining in Gran Canaria and Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain: Hydrogeological, environmental, economic and social aspects. Science of The Total Environment, 557, 425-437.‏
10. George-Laurentiu. M, M. Florentina-Cristina, & C. Andreea-Loreta, 2016. The Assessment of Social and Economic Impacts Associated to an Abandoned Mining Site Case study: Ciudanovita (Romania). Procedia Environmental Sciences, 32, 420-430.
11. Hilson, G, 2016. Farming, small-scale mining and rural livelihoods in Sub-Saharan Africa: A critical overview. The Extractive Industries and Society, 3(2), 547-563.‏
12. Kalantari, Kh., 2012. Data Processing and Analysis in Socio-Economic Research. (5th Ed.). Saba farhang, University of Tehran, 388 p.
13. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W., 1970. Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607- 610.
14. Lechner A.M., McIntyre, N., Witt K., Raymond C.M., Arnold S., Scott M., and Rifkin W. 2017. Challenges of integrated modelling in mining regions to address social, environmental and economic impacts. Environmental Modelling & Software, 93, 268-281.‏
15. Liu J., Dietz T., Carpenter S.R., Alberti M., Folke C., Moran E., Ostrom E. 2007. Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science, 317(5844), 1513-1516.
16. Liu L., Liu J., Zhang Z. 2014. Environmental justice and sustainability impact assessment: In search of solutions to ethnic conflicts caused by coal mining in Inner Mongolia, China. Sustainability, 6(12), 8756-8774.‏
17. Manowska A., Osadnik K.T., Wyganowska M. 2017. Economic and social aspects of restructuring Polish coal mining: Focusing on Poland and the EU. Resources Policy, 52, 192-200.‏
18. Meisanti M., Jusoff K., Salman D., Rukmana D. 2012. The impacts of gold mining on the farmer’s community. American-Eurasian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 6(4), 209-214.‏
19. Morrice E., Colagiuri R. 2013. Coal mining, social injustice and health: A universal conflict of power and priorities. Health & place, 19, 74-79.‏
20. Sabatini. F, 2009. Social capital as social networks: A new framework for measurement and an empirical analysis of its determinants and consequences. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(3), 429-442.‏
21. Saeedi garaghany. H. R, H. Arzani, M. Ghorbani & N. Jahanbakhsh goruohi, 2016. The analysis of social structure and indigenous knowledge Il Mohammad Soleimani city of Jiroft. Journal of Rangeland. 10 (1): 109-123.


XML   Persian Abstract   Print



Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 6, Issue 13 (3-2019) Back to browse issues page