[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
:: Volume 10, Issue 20 (9-2022) ::
PEC 2022, 10(20): 253-274 Back to browse issues page
The role of forests and pastures in combating the economic vulnerability of rural forest communities during the corona outbreak
Sajad Ghanbari *, Mostafa Jafari2
University of Tabriz, ghanbarisajad@gmail.com , ghanbarisajad@gmail.com
2- jafarimostafa@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (232 Views)
        The prevalence of Corona disease as one of the most critical infectious diseases has increased the risks of food security in different parts of the world. Local communities, especially in rural areas, are highly dependent on natural resource-based ecosystem service strategies to manage global food security and meet livelihood needs. Forests and pastures can also provide goods and services that are sold or consumed directly as part of natural resources. Identifying livelihood patterns can suggest several potential strategies for maintaining a livelihood in the face of sudden shocks such as corona. The main purpose of this study is to focus on identifying the dependency of rural communities to forests and rangelands during the corona outbreak and how to deal with and adapt to the economic damage of this disease through ecosystem-based services. The research method of this research is descriptive survey and data will be collected through field studies using a questionnaire. To complete the questionnaire, first the villages will be selected by pre-study and randomly. The results showed that livestock (67%) and agriculture (67%) were the main activities of local respondents. The average annual household income of the studied households was 1023 million Rials during the COVID-19 crisis. The average income diversity index for all sample households was 1.09. Income of local communities from forests and pastures were mostly from medicinal plants, fruits, fodder and mushrooms. The share of forests and pastures in the total household income of all interviewees was 1.43% and 2.84%, respectively. According to the results, 77.6% of respondents stated that they use natural resources including forests (63%) and pastures (67%). Forage collection (44.6%), medicinal plants (42.2%) and forest fruits (29.3%) were the three most important forest products that were mentioned among local respondents in Arasbaran forests. Given the global nature of the Corona crisis, identifying ecosystem-based strategies, especially forests and pastures, can inform rural communities in other parts of the country and the world. This study helps managers and planners assess the vulnerability of local communities and identify ways out of the crisis.
Keywords: Arasbaran, Corona virus, livelihood, rural communities, natural resources
Full-Text [PDF 1146 kb]   (66 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2021/11/20 | Accepted: 2022/08/4 | Published: 2022/09/22
References
1. Bennett, N. 2010. Sustainable livelihoods from theory to conservation practice: an extended annotated bibliography for prospective application of livelihoods approaches in protected area community research.
2. Boafo, Y.A., Saito, O., Jasaw, G.S., Otsuki, K., Takeuchi, K. 2016. Provisioning ecosystem services-sharing as a coping and adaptation strategy among rural communities in Ghana's semi-arid ecosystem. Ecosystem Services, 19: 92-102.
3. Cai, M., Pettenella, D., Vidale, E. 2011. Income generation from wild mushrooms in marginal rural areas. Forest Policy and Economics, 13, 221-226.
4. Dash, M., Behera, B. 2016. Determinants of household collection of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) and alternative livelihood activities in Similipal Tiger Reserve, India. Forest Policy and Economics, 73: 215-228.
5. Deressa, W., Hailemariam, D., Ali, A. 2007. Economic costs of epidemic malaria to households in rural Ethiopia. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 12, 1148-1156.
6. Derks, J., Giessen, L., Winkel, G. 2020. COVID-19-induced visitor boom reveals the importance of forests as critical infrastructure. Forest Policy and Economics, 118: 102253.
7. Fu, Y., Chen, J., Guo, H., Chen, A., Cui, J., Hu, H. 2009. The role of non-timber forest products during agroecosystem shift in Xishuangbanna, southwestern China. Forest Policy and Economics, 11: 18-25.
8. Gatiso, T.T., Ordaz-Németh, I., Grimes, T., Lormie, M., Tweh, C., Kühl, H.S., Junker, J. 2018. The impact of the Ebola virus disease (EVD) epidemic on agricultural production and livelihoods in Liberia. PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 12, e0006580.
9. Ghanbari, S., Aghai, M. 2020. The way towards getting back financial benefits from agroforestry systems and improving food security (the case of Arasbaran Biosphere reserve). ECOPERSIA, 9: 33-41.
10. Ghanbari, S., Heshmatol Vaezin, S.M., Shamekhi, T. 2017 Identification and economic prioritization of non-wood forest products of Arasbaran forests based on traditional harvest statistics (Case Study: Ilganachay Watershed). Iranin Journal of forest, 9: 411-425.
11. Ghanbari, S., Heshmatol Vaezin, S.M., Shamekhi, T., Eastin, I.L. 2014. Market expansion's influence on the harvesting of non-wood forest products in the Arasbaran forests of Iran. The Forestry Chronicle, 90, 599-604.
12. Ghanbari, S., Heshmatol Vaezin, S.M., Shamekhi, T., Eastin, I.L., Lovrić, N., Aghai, M.M. 2020. The economic and biological benefits of non-wood forest products to local communities in Iran. Economic Botany, 74: 59-73.
13. Golar, G., Malik, A., Muis, H., Herman, A., Nurudin, N., Lukman, L. 2020. The social-economic impact of COVID-19 pandemic: implications for potential forest degradation. Heliyon, 6, e05354.
14. Griffith, E.F., Craige, S., Manzano, P., Pius, L., Jost, C.C. 2021. Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on food security among East and West African pastoralists☆. In Advances in Food Security and Sustainability Elsevier.
15. Heubach, K., Wittig, R., Nuppenau, E.A., Hahn, K. 2011. The economic importance of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) for livelihood maintenance of rural west African communities: A case study from northern Benin. Ecological Economics, 70, 1991-2001.
16. Illukpitiya, P., Yanagida, J.F. 2010. Farming vs forests: Trade-off between agriculture and the extraction of non-timber forest products. Ecological Economics, 69, 1952-1963.
17. Liu, Y., Zhang, Q., Liu, Q., Yan, Y., Hei, W., Yu, D., Wu, J. 2020. Different Household Livelihood Strategies and Influencing Factors in the Inner Mongolian Grassland. Sustainability, 12, 839.
18. Mahdavi, A., Sobhani, H., Shamekhi, T. 2009. Investigation on Non-wood forest products and the utilization methods in kamyaran forests. Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 16: 507-520.
19. Mamo, G., Sjaastad, E., Vedeld, P. 2007. Economic dependence on forest resources: A case from Dendi District, Ethiopia. Forest Policy and Economics, 9, 916-927.
20. Motamedi, J., Mofidi Chelan, M., Rahmanpour, S., Souri, M. 2018. Economic Evaluation of Shallot Utilization in Varnasa Rangeland, Naghadeh, Iran. Journal of Rangeland Science, 8: 240-252.
21. Nguthi, F., Niehof, A. 2008. Effects of HIV/AIDS on the livelihood of banana-farming households in Central Kenya. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 56: 179-190.
22. O’Brien, L., Forster, J. 2020. Engagement with nature and Covid-19 restrictions. Quantitative analysis 2020.
23. Obrist, B., Mayumana, I., Kessy, F. 2010. Livelihood, malaria and resilience: a case study in the Kilombero Valley, Tanzania. Progress in Development Studies, 10: 325-343.
24. Olsen, J., Mitchell, R. 2020. Change in use of green and open space following COVID-19 lockdown ‘stay at home’phase and initial easing of lockdown. University of Glasgow: Glasgow, Scotland.
25. Pan, Y., Wei, G., Cunningham, A.A., Li, S., Chen, S., Milner-Gulland, E., Turvey, S.T. 2016. Using local ecological knowledge to assess the status of the Critically Endangered Chinese giant salamander Andrias davidianus in Guizhou Province, China. Oryx, 50: 257-264.
26. Pramova, E., Locatelli, B., Djoudi, H., Somorin, O.A. 2012. Forests and trees for social adaptation to climate variability and change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 3, 581-596.
27. Rice, W.L., Meyer, C., Lawhon, B., Taff, B.D., Mateer, T., Reigner, N., Newman, P. 2020. The COVID-19 pandemic is changing the way people recreate outdoors: preliminary report on a national survey of outdoor enthusiasts amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
28. Roberts, D., Boon, R., Diederichs, N., Douwes, E., Govender, N., Mcinnes, A., Mclean, C., O’Donoghue, S., Spires, M. 2012. Exploring ecosystem-based adaptation in Durban, South Africa:“learning-by-doing” at the local government coal face. Environment and Urbanization, 24, 167-195.
29. Saxena, A., Dutta, A., Fischer, H.W., Saxena, A.K., Jantz, P. 2021. Forest livelihoods and a “green recovery” from the COVID-19 pandemic: Insights and emerging research priorities from India. Forest Policy and Economics, 131: 102550.
30. Scarano, F.R. 2017. Ecosystem-based adaptation to climate change: concept, scalability and a role for conservation science. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, 15, 65-73.
31. Selemani, I.S. 2020. Indigenous knowledge and rangelands’ biodiversity conservation in Tanzania: success and failure. Biodiversity and Conservation, 1-14.
32. Sinthumule, N.I., Mashau, M.L. 2020. Traditional ecological knowledge and practices for forest conservation in Thathe Vondo in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Global Ecology and Conservation, e00910.
33. Soltani, A., Angelsen, A., Eid, T., Naieni, M.S.N., Shamekhi, T. 2012. Poverty, sustainability, and household livelihood strategies in Zagros, Iran. Ecological Economics, 79: 60-70.
34. Sunderlin, W.D., Angelsen, A., Belcher, B., Burgers, P., Nasi, R., Santoso, L., Wunder, S. 2005. Livelihoods, forests, and conservation in developing countries: an overview. World Development, 33, 1383-1402.
35. Vaughan, R.C., Munsell, J.F., Chamberlain, J.L. 2013. Opportunities for Enhancing Nontimber Forest Products Management in the United States. Journal of Forestry, 111: 26-33.
36. Vedeld, P., Angelsen, A., Bojö, J., Sjaastad, E., Kobugabe Berg, G. 2007. Forest environmental incomes and the rural poor. Forest Policy and Economics, 9: 869-879.
37. White, J., Morton, J. 2005. Mitigating impacts of HIV/AIDS on rural livelihoods: NGO experiences in sub-Saharan Africa. Development in practice, 15: 186-199.
38. WHO (2020) WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard.
39. Wunder, S., Börner, J., Shively, G., Wyman, M. 2014. Safety nets, gap filling and forests: a global-comparative perspective. World Development, 64: S29-S42.
40. Zhang, L., Guan, Z., Fei, H., Yan, L., Turvey, S.T., Fan, P. 2020. Influence of traditional ecological knowledge on conservation of the skywalker hoolock gibbon (Hoolock tianxing) outside nature reserves. Biological Conservation, 241: 108267.
41. Ziembicki, M., Woinarski, J., Mackey, B. 2013. Evaluating the status of species using Indigenous knowledge: Novel evidence for major native mammal declines in northern Australia. Biological Conservation, 157: 78-92.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ghanbari S, Jafari M. The role of forests and pastures in combating the economic vulnerability of rural forest communities during the corona outbreak. PEC 2022; 10 (20) :253-274
URL: http://pec.gonbad.ac.ir/article-1-825-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 10, Issue 20 (9-2022) Back to browse issues page
مجله حفاظت زیست بوم گیاهان Journal of Plant Ecosystem Conservation
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.07 seconds with 29 queries by YEKTAWEB 4505